1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | CJ5 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2490 mm |
