1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2008 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S40 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volvo S40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S40. (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ5 | S40 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1798 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |