1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ5 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
