1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 515 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CJ5 | C |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2008 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |