1956 Jensen Interceptor vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1956 Jensen Interceptor. (129 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 Jensen Interceptor.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Jensen Interceptor. (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Jensen Interceptor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Jensen Interceptor | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Jensen | Ford |
| Model | Interceptor | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3991 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3193 mm |
