1956 Lotus 11 vs. 1990 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1990 Holden Commodore is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Commodore (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Commodore weights approximately 930 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Lotus 11 | 1990 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | 11 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1956 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2740 mm |