1956 Lotus 11 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 805 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Lotus 11 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | 11 | 200 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
