1956 Lotus 11 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (182 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1456 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Lotus 11 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | 11 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2730 mm |