1956 Lotus 11 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 961 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Lotus 11 | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Lotus | Kia |
| Model | 11 | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1341 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2660 mm |
