1956 Lotus 11 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2204 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Lotus 11 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Lotus | Land Rover |
| Model | 11 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 2584 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2035 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2891 mm |
