1956 Lotus 11 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (542 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 468 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1470 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Lotus 11 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Lotus | Jaguar |
| Model | 11 | XK |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4794 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2032 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2752 mm |
