1956 Maserati 250 vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 797 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 250. (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 610 kg more than 1956 Maserati 250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati 250 | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Maserati | Koenigsegg |
| Model | 250 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1280 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
