1956 Maserati 250 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 250. (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1087 kg more than 1956 Maserati 250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati 250 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
Model | 250 | CTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1757 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |