1956 Maserati 300 vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Maserati 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Maserati 300 (242 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Volvo V50. (227 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Maserati 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo V50 weights approximately 842 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300.
Because 1956 Maserati 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Maserati 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati 300 | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | 300 | V50 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 756 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2650 mm |