1956 Maserati 300 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 300. (242 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati 300 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
| Model | 300 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 756 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2880 mm |
