1956 Maserati A6G vs. 1983 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1983 Holden Commodore is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1983 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Commodore weights approximately 320 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Holden Commodore has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Holden Commodore will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati A6G | 1983 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | A6G | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1891 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1160 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |
