1956 Maserati A6G vs. 1983 Volvo 760
To start off, 1983 Volvo 760 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 760 (156 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 760 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati A6G | 1983 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | A6G | 760 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2780 mm |