1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 880 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati A6G | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Maserati | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A6G | E |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2890 mm |