1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,341 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 330 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati A6G | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Maserati | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6G | Lancer |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1380 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |