1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 15 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G.
Because 1956 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati A6G | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Maserati | Suzuki |
Model | A6G | Reno |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |