1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan GT-R (481 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 555 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati A6G | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Maserati | Nissan |
| Model | A6G | GT-R |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 481 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1605 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2790 mm |
