1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati A6G | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Maserati | Audi |
| Model | A6G | TT |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2469 mm |
