1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Maserati A6G | 2010 BMW M3 | |
Make | Maserati | BMW |
Model | A6G | M3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1885 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2761 mm |