1956 Maserati A6G vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 830 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Maserati A6G | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Maserati | Jaguar |
| Model | A6G | XJ |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3157 mm |
