1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 556 kg more than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 190 | E |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3090 mm |