1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 has manual transmission. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | 190 | Epica |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |