1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 360 kg more than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Mercedes-Benz 219 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | 219 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2193 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |
