1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 (112 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | 220 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2193 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |