1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. (112 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | 220 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2193 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |