1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 (112 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 220 | C30 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2193 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 60 L |