1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (123 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. (112 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Audi |
Model | 220 | A3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2193 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |