1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. (162 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 has manual transmission. 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | 220 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2194 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
