1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. (276 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 has manual transmission. 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: