1956 Mercury Montclair vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercury Montclair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercury Montclair would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Mercury Montclair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Mercury Montclair (258 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Mercury Montclair should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Mercury Montclair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Mercury Montclair | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Montclair | XC90 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2800 mm |