1956 Morris Cowley vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Cowley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Cowley would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Citi (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1956 Morris Cowley. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Cowley. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Morris Cowley weights approximately 197 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1956 Morris Cowley is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Morris Cowley. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Morris Cowley | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
| Make | Morris | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cowley | Citi |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 116 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1054 kg | 857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 49 L |
