1956 Morris Minor vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Minor would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1956 Morris Minor. (30 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Minor.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Morris Minor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Korando (257 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Morris Minor. (54 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Morris Minor | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Morris | SsangYong |
| Model | Minor | Korando |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2490 mm |
