1956 Morris Oxford vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1985 Ford Tempo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Tempo (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1956 Morris Oxford. (52 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 38 kg more than 1956 Morris Oxford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Tempo (170 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Morris Oxford. (106 Nm). This means 1985 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Morris Oxford. 1985 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 1956 Morris Oxford has manual transmission. 1956 Morris Oxford will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Morris Oxford | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Morris | Ford |
| Model | Oxford | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |
