1956 Morris Oxford vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1956 Morris Oxford. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Oxford.
Because 1956 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Morris Oxford. (106 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Morris Oxford | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Morris | Nissan |
Model | Oxford | Micra |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2449 mm |