1956 Opel Rekord vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1956 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1956 Opel Rekord.
Because 1956 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Opel Rekord | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Opel | Volvo |
| Model | Rekord | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4807 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1936 mm |
