1956 Packard Carribean vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Carribean. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Carribean would be higher. At 6,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Carribean is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Carribean (306 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Carribean should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Packard Carribean weights approximately 1344 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Packard Carribean is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Packard Carribean. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Packard Carribean | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Packard | Renault |
Model | Carribean | Clio |
Year Released | 1956 | 1990 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 6129 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2249 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |