1956 Packard Patrician vs. 2005 Pontiac GTO

To start off, 2005 Pontiac GTO is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac GTO (400 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1956 Packard Patrician. (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1956 Packard Patrician.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Packard Patrician 2005 Pontiac GTO
Make Packard Pontiac
Model Patrician GTO
Year Released 1956 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5767 cc 5965 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 271 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 5530 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3240 mm 2800 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]