1956 Packard Patrician vs. 2011 Kia Forte
To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2011 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Forte.
Because 1956 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Packard Patrician | 2011 Kia Forte | |
Make | Packard | Kia |
Model | Patrician | Forte |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5767 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3240 mm | 2649 mm |