1956 Porsche 356 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1956 Porsche 356. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1956 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 825 kg more than 1956 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1956 Porsche 356 has manual transmission. 1956 Porsche 356 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Porsche 356 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Porsche | Renault |
Model | 356 | Zo |
Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 83 L |