1956 Porsche 356 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Porsche 356 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1956 Porsche 356. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1956 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 626 kg more than 1956 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Porsche 356 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Porsche | Lotus |
Model | 356 | Evora |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 60 L |