1956 Porsche 356 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1956 Porsche 356.
Because 1956 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Porsche 356 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Porsche | Volvo |
Model | 356 | C30 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2640 mm |