1956 Renault Juva vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Renault Juva | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Renault | Acura |
| Model | Juva | TL |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2840 mm |
