1956 Renault Juva vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 834 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Renault Juva | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Juva | Camry |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2800 mm |