1956 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 951 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Renault Juva | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | Juva | XK |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2751 mm |