1956 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 526 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Renault Juva | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | Juva | Cube |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1271 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2530 mm |
