1956 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1148 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Renault Juva | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Juva | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2774 mm |
